Local Transport Today is the authoritative, independent journal for transport decision makers. Analysis, Comment & News on Transport Policy, Planning, Finance and Delivery since 1989.

Spending review: the winners and losers in the transport stakes

Which transport sectors did well and which did badly in the Comprehensive Spending Review? Throughout the linked articles LTT delves into the detail of the review and speaks to experts to see what the settlement means for transport policy and delivery

29 October 2010

 

In the end it was bad but not quite as gloomy as some had expected. The DfT faces a 15% real terms cut to its budget between 2010/11 and 2014/15, slightly below the 19% reduction to Government spending overall.

Transport secretary Philip Hammond’s argument that transport infrastructure investment was vital for the economy played out well, with just an 11% reduction in the Department’s capital budget. The settlement ensures the delivery of a number of ‘big ticket’ infrastructure projects and programmes, notably Network Rail’s enhancement programme, London Underground upgrades and the capital’s east-west Crossrail route.

The Highways Agency’s trunk roads budget will, however, be heavily cutback and local authority capital funding will also suffer cuts. Many councils will learn in the New Year that their major transport schemes are unaffordable. London boroughs could see a 25% reduction to their Local Implementation Plan budgets.

Councils in England must also grapple with a 28% reduction in revenue support from central government. Staff cuts, new approaches to service delivery and reductions to tendered bus networks and road maintenance are all likely consequences.

The DfT itself faces a 21% cut to revenue spending. This will be delivered partly through rises in rail fares and cuts to bus subsidy. The latter will, in turn, force operators to reduce services or put up fares.

The relatively good capital settlement for the DfT is not mirrored in the devolved nations. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland all face capital cuts of 35-40% over the next four years with obvious consequences for transport investment.

For the environmental lobby there was some cheer with the news that the DfT’s Local Sustainable Transport Fund will provide £560m over four years for packages of low-cost transport improvements. 

DfT Expenditure Tables

£m cash Baseline 2010-2011 Capital (1) 2011-12 Capital 2012-13 Capital 2013-14 Capital 2014-15 Capital
National Roads (Highways Agency) 1571 1244 921 877 1040
Rail (including net rail income) 3778 4109 4896 4662 4532
Local government funding 1618 1554 1503 1465 1664
o/w Local Sustainable Transport Fund n/a 30 40 60 80
o/w maintenance 871 806 779 750 707
o/w Integrated Transport Block grant 450 300 320 320 450
o/w Major local enhancement schemes 199 418 364 335 427
London transport grants n/a 424 352 184 0
Other programmes 719 400 410 292 281
o/w Regional Growth Fund n/a 165 100 - -
Total 7686 7731 8082 7480 7517

£m Cash Baseline 2010-2011 Resource (1) 2011-12 Resource 2012-13 Resource 2013-14 Resource 2014-15 Resource 2014-15 Resource
National Roads (Highways Agency) 1124 1118 1016 998 947 -23%
Rail (including net rail income) -337 -87 -247 -483 -435 n/a
Local government funding (3) 473 378 401 413 420 -28%
o/w Local Sustainable Transport Fund n/a 50 100 100 100 n/a
o/w transferred to CLG formula grants (3) n/a 303 276 288 295 n/a
Local PFI (4) 170 195 239 311 320 71%
London transport grants 2764 2804 2803 2699 2404 -21%
o/w General TfL grant n/a - - 200 - n/a
o/w Investment grant 295 272 252 233 216 -33%
Other programmes 1091 1007 907 1131 884 -27%
o/w Regional Growth Fund n/a - - 200 - n/a
o/w Departmental Administration 295 272 252 233 216 -33%
VED Collection & Enforcement (5) 191 189 190 191 191 -9%
Total 5141 5299 5033 4971 4436 -21%
 

Key:

  1. The Government's spending review process allocated capital according to a bottom-up appraisal methodology; baselines for 2010/11 for individual programmes are therefore estimates and inflated baselines for subsequent years are not available. Therefore savings against baseline do not apply.
  2. % reductions compared to the 2010/11 baseline adjusted for inflation
  3. These payments transfer to CLG budgets and are therefore not included in DfT's total DEL. The baseline includes funding for demographic pressures on Concessionary Fares in later years
  4. Private Finance Initiative (PFI)   
  5. Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) Collection & Enforcement

 


Technical Lead - Oxford Workplace Parking Levy
Oxfordshire County Council
County Hall, Oxford
£47,420 - £50,512 per annum
Development Engineer
London Borough of Bexley
Bexley
£34,476 - £39,777 per annum
Electric Vehicle Programme Manager
London Borough of Hounslow
Hounslow
£49,083 -£52,116 per annum
View all Vacancies
 
Search
 
 
 

TransportXtra is part of Landor LINKS

© 2024 TransportXtra | Landor LINKS Ltd | All Rights Reserved

Subscriptions, Magazines & Online Access Enquires
[Frequently Asked Questions]
Email: subs.ltt@landor.co.uk | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7091 7959

Shop & Accounts Enquires
Email: accounts@landor.co.uk | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7091 7855

Advertising Sales & Recruitment Enquires
Email: daniel@landor.co.uk | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7091 7861

Events & Conference Enquires
Email: conferences@landor.co.uk | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7091 7865

Press Releases & Editorial Enquires
Email: info@transportxtra.com | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7091 7875

Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Advertise

Web design london by Brainiac Media 2020