Parking is a problem for drivers, who often struggle with the availability of spaces and prices. It is also an issue for pedestrians and cyclists, who have to manoeuvre around vehicles parked incorrectly or in undesignated areas. And it is a challenge for public authorities as large sections of cities and towns have to be assigned to the single-purpose of accommodating stationary vehicles.
Parking can have a negative impact on the safety of an area and its aesthetic. Moreover, on a larger scale, parking is difficult to control. It also aggravates the introduction of new transportation policies, inhibits the reduction of car use as well as the transformation towards sustainable modes of mobility.
Existing solutions to the parking problem rest on a general assumption that a parking space is a commodity. As such, it must be provided as conveniently as possible for the most competitive price in any given area.
The increasing use of big data and artificial intelligence (AI) by private companies that are developing applications for parking allocation and payments – as well as the growing use of sensors and cameras by councils – underpins the perception of parking as a commodity. Parking clearly has a business aspect. But in a wider sense, it is also closely related to urban planning and policies that have to be reoriented to address environmental challenges, such as pollution and the adverse effects of fossil fuel consumption.
In recent years, many cities, including London, have decided to change planning regulations and abandon parking minimums or include parking in their transportation policies. Some European cities plan to limit car use significantly over the course of the next few years. One of the mechanisms that will help them do so is the reduction of available parking spaces.
Parked cars are part of the urban landscape
Huge swathes of our cities have been built with cars in mind. The emergence of the car gave rise to road-building projects, the standardisation of road laws, growth in oil production and many other factors that continue to shape urban and suburban life.
This has been famously characterised by the British sociologist John Urry as the “system of automobility”. But the fact that cars spend more time parked is an often overlooked facet of our everyday urban experience. With that in mind, perhaps we should also talk about “autoimmobility” and its impacts, key amongst them being the ‘car-scapes’ created by stationary vehicles, as well as the time and money spent to manage the large number of stationary cars that litter our densely populated areas.
Building on that assumption, parking can be considered in a two ways: both as an everyday (im)mobility issue, and as a part of our urban infrastructure. A sociological mindset can help bring those two distinct aspects together: whilst parking a car is a relatively simple and mundane activity, it always involves the interaction of a human with a vehicle. This will take place in locales that frequently draw upon specific knowledge of road law and local regulations as well as an orientation in the area.
The pressure to create more parking spaces can influence social meanings and personal emotions that, in turn, can define how it is done and its consequences for other drivers and pedestrians. A better understanding of how those components of social practice interact with parking can help clarify many of its inherent complexities and reveal the deeper role it can play in people’s lives.
Parking might be simple, but that doesn’t mean it is not complicated – it can affect our interactions with other people, limit our mobility and frequently requires us to reorganise our daily schedules and adjust plans.
Parking is part of our infrastructure
Parking must be understood as a kind of urban infrastructure that is both obdurate and creates a network of spaces in need of constant maintenance.
However, unlike other types of infrastructure, it is also very fragmented, often un-standardised, with different type of providers – from local administrations to private companies – and costly. It needs to be seen as one of the core systems that makes cities work and, as such, should be carefully regulated and organised in response to the challenges of today’s urban areas.
As well as being provided by councils and car park operators, parking is produced by drivers themselves. One example of this is turning front yards or driveways into parking spaces, as often happens in the suburbs. But it also happens that parking infrastructure is produced by practice itself – for example, when people stop or leave their vehicle illegally or semi-legally. Therefore, when it comes to parking we need to talk about ‘infrastructuring’ as an active and constant process of creating infrastructure by many different actors.
Parking is a policy and planning issue that will constantly have to change in the transforming reality of urban transportation. As with any change, it will depend not only on technological innovation but also on the social capacity for adaptation.
Big data and new, inventive solutions to the ‘parking problem’ have to be combined with a better understanding of what it means to park a car and how it relates to the maintenance and emergence of parking infrastructure in cities.
Dr Karol Kurnicki
TransportXtra is part of Landor LINKS
© 2020 TransportXtra | Landor LINKS Ltd | All Rights Reserved
Subscriptions, Magazines & Online Access Enquires
[Frequently Asked Questions]
Email: email@example.com | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7091 7959
Shop & Accounts Enquires
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7091 7855
Advertising Sales & Recruitment Enquires
Email: email@example.com | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7091 7861
Events & Conference Enquires
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7091 7865
Press Releases & Editorial Enquires
Email: email@example.com | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7091 7875
Website design by Brainiac Media 2020